However gratefully the author appreciates the initiative of the directors of the Hochschulwochen to make its talks available to its participants in a privately published edition, he nonetheless hesitates to consent to the publication of his own contribution. He is aware of the fact that in his mode of action the spoken and the written word are even farther apart than is generally the case today. If he spoke in such a way as he would have to write for the sake of the binding force of factual representation, he would remain incomprehensible. Nothing, however, that he says can do justice to what he must expect of a text. The more general the topics -- and the
subject of this published talk was worded in a fatally general way -- the greater the difficulties become for someone whom a critic recently and in a friendly manner certified that his production conformed to the dictum "God is in the details." Where a text would have to provide exact documentary proof, such talks inevitably do not go beyond the dogmatic claim of results. He is thus unable to accept the responsibility for the printed text that follows and merely regards it as aiding the memory of those who were present during his improvisation and who -- as a result of the modest stimulations that he provided -- want to continue thinking about the discussed questions on their own. The author regards the ubiquitous tendency to record free speech [die freie Rede], as it is called, on tape, and then to disseminate it itself as a symptom of the administered world that even ties down the ephemeral word, whose truth lies in its own transience, and then makes the speaker swear to it. The tape recording is something like the fingerprint of the living mind [lebendigen Geistes]. By making use of the kind readiness of the course's director to say all of these things openly, the author hopes to prevent at least some of the misinterpretations to which he would otherwise inevitably subject himself. [Trans. by Mark Kalbus]

Leave a comment