Issue 83: Summer 2005
Surveillance
Table of Contents
Surveillance: Work, Myth, and Policy
Abstract:
Surveillance is tough work. Depending on the job, the U.S. Department
of Labor tells us that working conditions can include any combination of
the following: stress, considerable time spent on the feet, danger, confrontations
with angry or upset individuals, risk, physical discomfort, lethal
hazards, fi eldwork in high crime areas, monotony, constant alertness to
threatening situations, irregular hours, and a heavy toll on private life.1
On top of the physical and psychological strain, a surveillance worker
must also possess great self-discipline to control unproductive ethical
impulses to look away, to perceive innocence instead of guilt, to see a
friend not a foe, to accept the ineffable and resist the probable. Such care
for the person being watched may not be so tempting as screwing around
on the job, which for a surveillance worker could amount to the same
thing as having an ethical moment. Whatever the case, the humanity of
the surveillance worker has always been a weakness of surveillance systems,
especially in the eyes of those overseeing the work.
Every Move You Make: Bodies, Surveillance, and Media
Abstract:
Historically, the forms of surveillance attending episodes of militarization,
warring violence, and internal surveillance are part of a more general
biopolitics. They are articulated with other political functions aimed
at accepting, rejecting, or managing bodies. The concept of biopolitics,
which is increasingly invoked in critical political analyses, originates with
Michel Foucault's discussion of the "biopolitics of the population," an
exercise of governance that "brought life and its mechanisms into the
realm of explicit calculations" in the nineteenth century.1 Whereas previously
states contained a "people" who were subject to the sovereign's
prerogatives, by the mid-nineteenth century, governance involved more
than merely extracting obedience from its subjects. It became involved in
managing a "population," understood in terms of the energy and cooperation
that could be expected from bodies that work, serve in the army,
or, at a minimum, maintain the coherence and positive functioning of
the family.
Biometrics and Post-9/11 Technostalgia
Abstract:
The idea that computerized face recognition may have helped avert the al-
Qaeda terrorist attacks was perhaps the most ambitious claim circulating
about biometric identifi cation technologies in the aftermath of September
11. Along with the enormous fl ood of imagery of the day relayed in the
news media were the out-of-focus surveillance-camera images of two of
the alleged attackers. The recorded video image from the airport in Portland
that appears to show Mohammad Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari passing
through airport security is a familiar part of 9/11 iconography. It is
virtually impossible to reference this image without also invoking the claim
that facial recognition technology could have identifi ed the men in the
image as wanted terrorist suspects. Already existing commercially available
technology, according to this regretful yet strangely hopeful assertion,
"could have instantly checked the image against photos of suspected
terrorists." Technologies that use digital readings of the face to identify
individuals could have saved the United States from the worst terrorist
attack in its history.
Surveillance in Decolonized Social Space: THE CASE OF SEX WORKERS IN BENGAL
Abstract:
In depicting contemporary panopticism, Roy Boyne has identifi ed danger
as the single most effective cause of surveillance, where "danger from
our enemies, danger from those who might grow into our enemies, [and]
danger from those who could not look after themselves" were different
categories.1 The dangers posed by the vulnerable and the criminal
are linked within the regime of surveillance that has been imposed on
the sexually marginalized female prostitutes of Bengal, who are neither
criminals nor victims and yet have been both criminalized and victimized
by the medico-moral-legal code of surveillance that defi nes them. The
prostitute as the site of work, sex, disease, power, desire, and pleasure has
recently emerged from these contested constructions as a new political
subject. The global epidemic of AIDS has forced a radical remapping
of sexual boundaries, with prostitutes as the most likely group to contract
and spread the disease. The concern for sexual health has given the
prostitutes new visibility: from the familiar status of a marginal group
of sexually aberrant women, they are now being considered a signifi cant
target for public health policy. In the post-1990 phase of modernization,
the Indian state has been keen to include them in the welfare agenda and
regulate their behavior through surveillance that marks their bodies as
domains of sexual health and social discipline.
Resisting Surveillance
Abstract:
If you ever visit the remote hills and hollows that make up the far southeastern corner of Appalachian Ohio, you will fi nd the poorest counties
in the state. There will be roads you can barely drive on, schools that are
chronically underfunded, and legions of people who are unemployed or
consigned to jobs that lack the income and benefi ts needed for a secure
life. Because of the structural poverty of the region, many families receive
help from the state's Department of Job and Family Services, formally
called the Department of Human Services and known by everyone but
the bureaucrats as "the welfare office."
Global Citizens and Local Powers: SURVEILLANCE IN TURKEY
Abstract:
Turkey's Central Population Administrative System--Merkezi Nüfus
Ídaresi Sistemi (MERNI˙S)--is at the center of the Turkish state's efforts
to establish a database of information about its population. MERNI˙S
increases the state's powers to (re)produce individuals for hegemonic
purposes by adapting the state's administrative practices to the dynamics
of contemporary processes of global production. By assigning individuals
a unique number that identifi es them as citizens, MERNI˙S generates
the necessary local conditions to align Turkey with the emerging
global control society. MERNI˙S was designed to eliminate repetition
and inconsistencies in the state's information systems and to consolidate
various kinds of information on its citizens. According to the Ministry of
Internal Affairs, this one-numbered system supplies perfect, rapid, and
reliable services, making life easy for citizens.1 One number also indicates
the centralization of power and helps solidify Turkish state authority.
This is centralization not only of power but also of identifi cation of the
individual.
From Privacy to Visibility: CONTEXT, IDENTITY, AND POWER IN UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS
Abstract:
Everywhere in our daily lives, we are identifi ed, tracked, profi led, and
known. Infrastructures of surveillance--everyday, taken-for-granted,
institutionalized, and technically mediated practices that identify individuals
and observe and analyze their actions--permeate society. These
infrastructures determine who is able to view whom, at what expense,
and for what purpose. They mediate the production of social knowledge
and social power.
The popular press decries these developments for the loss of privacy
they entail. Scholars warn that these surveillance practices group individuals
into classes, then treat those classes in a discriminatory fashion. But
visibility is not always detrimental to individuals or social groups. The
construction of identity, the naming of a group, the claiming of membership
in that group, the representation and dissemination of knowledge of
the group, is a strategy of political power. The political (and epistemological)
question is not whether individuals are known and typifi ed. We always
are. Rather, it is a question of how individuals are known and typifi ed--by
whom, to whom, as what, and toward what end we are made visible. This
article moves the arguments over information environments away from
issues of privacy, probing instead the ethical allocation of the resources of
visibility and knowledge production.
Suppressing Grief: THE POLITICS OF "MCCARTHY"-ERA TESTIMONIES
Abstract:
A sweeping movement toward acknowledging state crimes against citizens
has been one of the most striking signs of recent political statesmanship
and broad-based efforts for social justice after the innumerable civil
devastations of the twentieth century. In Argentina, the unoffi cial story
in all its harrowing detail became the offi cial story. Elsewhere, "following
Australia's offi cial apology to Aborigines delivered by Paul Keating,
Clinton made amends to Native Hawaiians, ex-PM Murayama apologized
for Japanese war crimes, [and] Tony Blair expiated on behalf of the Irish
potato famine."1 All these national stories have their own specifi city, but
one element is common to all. In any process of national reconciliation,
fi rst-person testimonies from the victims are crucial.
Copying Kill Bill
Abstract:
Holding a pirated VCD copy of Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (dir. Quentin Tarantino,
2003) that he found on a Beijing street, U.S. Commerce Secretary Don
Evans solemnly warned the Chinese government in his Beijing press
conference: "We have been patient but our patience is wearing thin."1
Evans was on the mission to coerce the Chinese government to further
open its markets for American products and services; this economic mission
was a crucial item in George W. Bush's reelection campaign, and
Evans chose to attract media's attention and solicit the American people's
identifi cation by picking up on a pirated Hollywood fi lm as the ultimate
symbol of China's disrespect of fair trade in general and the country's
robbery of American wealth specifi cally. The VCD copy, according to
Evans, was found all over Beijing, yet the fi lm had begun its fi rst run in
movie theaters in the United States just two weeks before and was not
available in U.S. stores in video or DVD format. Evans told members of
the American Chamber of Commerce in Beijing that "it didn't take long.
In the last twenty-four hours, I was able to purchase a CD on the streets
of Beijing."2 As Evans had arrived in Beijing only the afternoon before,
his assertion simply implies that hitting the streets of the capital to locate
a bootlegged version of a recent big-hit Hollywood fi lm was the fi rst, and
probably the most important, task for this high-profi le China visit. With
a pirated fi lm in hand, Evans could praise American creativity, criticize
protectionism, defend globalization, celebrate market liberalization, and
curse political authoritarianism all at the same time. The bootlegged Kill
Bill VCD effectively condensed a basket of capitalist ideology into one
sublime object.
