America is saving herself from all her dangers. Over some republics the
octopus sleeps still, but by the law of equilibrium other republics are
running into the sea to recover the lost centuries with mad and sublime
swiftness.
-- José MartÃ, "Our America," 20 January 1891
Theorizing the Americas is a long tradition in the United States and not always a felicitous practice. When José MartÃ's 1891 essay "Our America" was published in Mexico City in 1891, the United States had been publicly debating the annexation of Cuba for a half century. The Americas, having cast off one empire, had suffered nearly a century of imperialist theorizing, beginning with the articulation of the Monroe Doctrine and culminating with the seizure of half of Mexico's territory following the Mexican-American War. But during the neoimperial campaigns of the Spanish American War, a reinvigorated opposition to empire had reached a new crisis, and a resistant critique denouncing U.S. imperialism was being voiced not only by revolutionaries like MartÃ, but by U.S. citizens in the Anti-Imperialist League, the first national peace movement mobilized in response to a foreign war. In the league's platform, they wrote:
We hold that the policy known as imperialism is hostile to liberty and tends
toward militarism, an evil from which it has been our glory to be free. We
regret that it has become necessary in the land of Washington and Lincoln
to reaffirm that all men, of whatever race or color, are entitled to life, liberty
and the pursuit of happiness. We maintain that governments derive their
just powers from the consent of the governed. We insist that the subjugation
of any people is "criminal aggression" and open disloyalty to the distinctive
principles of our Government.

Leave a comment