Abstract:
Michael Brown's article "Ideology and the Metaphysics of Content" (SOCIAL TEXT 8, 1983) reminds us of what was at stake in the transition from ideology critique to cultural studies. Through an ethnomethodological close reading of the opening part of Marx's Capital, Brown teaches us that this text is educative before it is didactic and that its meaning is historical and available only in the encounter with the reader, an encounter that produces both reader and text. There is no room here for a correct content independent of reading in history. Brown's example is used to stage an encounter in teaching, in a British business school, between undergraduate students and reports of the current financial crisis, approaching the crisis phenomenologically. The article concludes with a discussion of mutual promises and possession in the world of finance.
I do have an ideology.
-- Milton Friedman, Financial Times, 2008
Hard Core Republican Is Turning Cisco into a Socialist Enterprise
-- Headline in Fast Company magazine, November 2008
When Michael E. Brown published his "Ideology and the Metaphysics of Content" (ST 8, 1983), Marxian analysis of ideology, so prevalent in the 1960s and 1970s, was only beginning to yield to the insights and practices of cultural studies. Brown's brilliant piece still teaches us what was at stake in that transition. The essay warns us against starting from the premise of a politics that knows itself as complete. Under such circumstances, a fully formed politics can only confront a subject as an external force. The analyst is left with this clash of subject and text, and of what is true and what is false in this face-off. It is little wonder that this kind of analysis fed a metaphysics of correct content on the Left that was ultimately alien to historical materialism. To help us avoid this trap of a text whose meaning is revealed and guarded by analysts, Brown makes a distinction between what he calls analysis and something he calls simply reading.
Leave a comment